The City takes a stand on housing, environment and justice bills


Santa Clarita City Council considered environmental, housing and justice issues when it took several federal and state legal positions on Tuesday evening.

Board members vote for the legislation as part of an agenda approval schedule with various business items.

Of the four bills opposed by the council, two (SB12 and SB778) attempt to enter the management of land use zones.

SB 12 proposes to limit development in these areas by using very high fire risk zoning.

Municipalities such as the City of Santa Clarita are building new homes or increasing occupancy in areas with very high fire risk, unless the city can demonstrate that it meets “fire hazard reduction standards”. forest fire ”established by the proposal. You are not allowed to approve the construction. right.

The bill was passed by its original seat, the Senate, but was not cleared by the Parliamentary Committee on Housing and Community Development in a vote held on July 12.

The committee voted unanimously to review the bill at a later date.

SB 778 states that “Local governments will convert commercial, industrial, retail or other vacant space in existing multi-use or multi-family home structures into attached residential units within 60 days. (ADU), ”according to a report from a city official.

The bill awaits the committee’s referral to Congress after being approved by the Senate. Likewise, SB 679, which forms an affordable housing solutions agency in Los Angeles County, received a negative vote from the board.

The proposed 18-member organization has the authority to issue public debt and county residents tax to finance the construction of affordable housing. The bill also requires that 70% of funds raised by the agency be allocated to the four most populous cities in the county, including Santa Clarita.

The city council voted against SB262 on the issue of justice, “waiving the monetary bond for all misdemeanors and certain crimes, as stated in the law,” the city report explained.

Serious and violent crimes, violent domestic crimes and certain other criminal crimes require a bond under this proposed law. However, trespassing, public intoxication, fraud, shoplifting of properties not exceeding $ 950 and other felonies do not require a bond.

The bail bill is on the verge of final approval as it heads to the Parliamentary Expenses Committee.

Board members approved SB619. The state imposes penalties on local governments for failing to comply with regulations that help the state meet its goal of setting a methane emissions reduction target of 75% reduction in organic waste disposal in landfills at landfills. 2014 levels. If possible, the bill will be postponed until 2025.

Instead of January 1, 2022, the state has the power to impose sanctions on the first day of 2023.

SB 619 was recently unanimously approved by the Parliamentary Committee on Natural Resources. He will then be heard by the Parliamentary Committee on Expenses.

The council also voted in favor of the Rim of the Valley Corridor Conservation Act, a federal bill drafted by Dianne Feinstein in California.

The bill will be more than double that of the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area, which includes the mountains surrounding the city.

In Santa Clarita, the land between Angeles National Forest and State Highway 14 will be part of 191,000 acres in addition to the existing 154,000 acres.

According to the city report, the US Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources will discuss the bill last month and meet again at a later date to consider the changes and approvals.

The city takes a position on housing, environment, justice bills Source link The city takes a position on housing, environment, justice bills

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.